"Culturally relevant pedagogy rests on three criteria or propositions: (a)Students must experience academic success; (b) students must develop and/or maintain cultural competence; and (c) students must develop a critical consciousness through which they challenge the status quo of the current social order."
taken from "But That's Just Good Teaching! The Case for Culturally Relevant Pedagogy" by Gloria Ladson-Billings.
"The trick of culturally relevant teaching is to get students to 'choose' academic excellence."
I must learn this trick again. When I first entered the teaching field after spending several years in academia (PSU for undergrad and U Penn for grad), I could've tackled this challenge with quite a bit of vim and vigor. 20 years later, battle-weary and worn, I must re-learn what I once took for granted --Teaching is the art of transformation.
When I first exited the hallowed halls of U Penn, transformation was what I was seeking, was what both my husband and I assumed we were pursuing. We attended school at the University of Pennsylvania's Graduate School of Education where we read the works of Bell, Dewey, and --yes -- Ladson-Billings. Our fingers were on the pulse of micro-aggressions and "White Privilege." We spent countless hours with our peers discussing the state of the black community and our passionate desire to make a difference in the world. We talked in terms of Dubois's "double-consciousness," the concepts of code-switching and the then-popular "Ebonics."
It was a glorious time in our lives -- meeting friends at Valley Forge for brunch and conversation, biking on East River Drive with only our passionate convictions in tow (children would come much later).
Fast forward two decades. After having to defend myself against false accusations of racism during my first year of teaching, it has taken me almost as much time to rebuild my confidence in who I am as a teacher, transformer and person. Like the incumbent who claims to be running as an "outsider" because he doesn't want to be labeled as belonging to the "establishment," I am now part of a system that has transformed me into a cog.
Where and how does this transformation take place? Life happens. A freshman teacher is accused of wrong, defends herself and must navigate the waters alone. Second guessing herself at every turn, she makes strides, but receives no real guidance. As the years progress, she continues to battle issues of doubt and low self-esteem, all the while trying to understand and implement the "latest and greatest" trends in the district. Enter a new curriculum which calls for strict adherence and what remains of any form of ingenuity and creativity gets crammed into the narrow confines of pacing and specified patterns of learning. Finally, add in a dose of objective evaluation which easily mutates into subjectivity in the right hands and -- presto -- you have a veteran teacher.
So where am I now. Surely I could have used a dose of culturally relevant pedagogy in my own shaping. But it's too late for that. I must come out on the other side as a seeker of change. That's where the journey began for me and my husband, wanting to make a difference. Indeed, that's the goal for both teacher and student -- to "challenge the status quo." I forgot that such an undertaking is tantamount to declaring war and in war there are casualties, winners and losers.
So it's been a 20 year war that I am recovering from, but still fighting in. Who said change was easy? Who said transformers don't get knocked down and pushed about? Effort, resilience, stick-to-it-tiveness are all required for those who seek to make a difference.
The question is "Am I still a seeker?" Absolutely! I haven't endured such intense personal and professional battles as an educator just to raise the white flag and march off the battlefield with upraised arms in surrender. I'm all in. If Ladson-Billings delineates three components of culturally relevant pedagogy, I'll certainly add that to my planning.